ACCESS CONTROL • VIDEO SURVEILLANCE • REMOTE MONITORING
Data center physical security
Access control systems, IP video surveillance, intrusion detection and 24/7 remote monitoring for data centers, server rooms and industrial IT environments, from design through to systems integration.
Our services
Security concept, zoning and detailed design for data center and server room environments.
Access control systems, IP camera systems, intrusion detection and video analytics, vendor-independent.
Installation, VMS and PSIM integration and commissioning in live, operating environments.
Regular maintenance, camera system review, 24/7 alarm receiving and remote monitoring.
Analog to IP camera migration, access control system replacement and extension of existing systems.
Physical security review, permissions and logging audit, gap list and schedule.
DATA CENTER PHYSICAL SECURITY
Data center physical security systems and technologies
- Access control systems (RFID, card, mobile)
- Biometric access control and multi-factor authentication
- IP camera systems and video surveillance
- Video analytics and intelligent event detection
- Intrusion detection and alarm systems
- Rack-level locking and cabinet access logging
- Mantraps, turnstiles and barrier-controlled access
- License plate recognition camera systems
- VMS and PSIM systems integration
- 24/7 remote monitoring and alarm receiving
FUNDAMENTALS
What does physical security mean in a data center?
Physical security in a data center is not a single camera system or an access gate but a series of layers built on one another. Working from the outside in: the site boundary, the building entrance, the technical zones, the white space, and finally the rack cabinet itself. Every layer means its own access permission, its own camera coverage and its own logging. The aim is that an unauthorized visitor meets another obstacle at every level, and that every step is documented.
The most important difference from an office building is granularity. In an office it is enough to know who entered the building. In a colocation data center you have to be able to prove who opened cabinet 4 in row 12, when, for how long, and on what permission. For that, access control has to reach down to rack level, with electronic cabinet locks, individual identification and event logging.
The same difference applies to the camera system. A camera system designed to deter and one that can produce evidence are not the same thing. The second needs an image recorded at a resolution, angle and light level where the face and the activity can be identified afterwards. A camera mounted at the end of a corridor pointing at the ceiling looks impressive; it is not evidence.
Physical security in a data center is not primarily protection against burglary, it is what gets you through audits. Your customers, your partners and your own certification processes, such as ISO 27001, EN 50600, Uptime Institute Tier and customer due diligence, will all ask how you control and log physical access.
EXPERIENCE
Common mistakes in data center physical security systems
Permissions that are never revoked. The most common mistake, and the cheapest to fix: a departed employee or the subcontractor from a closed project still has a working card months later. Without permission reviews and automatic revocation tied to the HR or onboarding process, this builds up in every organization.
Camera footage that cannot be used as evidence. The camera sees the event, but the face cannot be identified: wrong angle, backlight at the end of the corridor, resolution too low, or compression that falls apart on movement. The system works, it just is not usable at the exact moment you need it.
Retention time set wrong. Either shorter than an audit or a contract expects, so by the time the problem surfaces the recording has been overwritten, or unnecessarily long, which inflates the storage requirement for nothing. Retention time has to be chosen deliberately and the system sized for it, rather than left to how full the disk is.
Rack-level access that is never logged. In a colocation environment everything is controlled down to the room, and nothing beyond it. The tenant then cannot prove who had access to their equipment.
Island systems that do not talk to each other. Access control in one vendor's software, the camera system in another, intrusion detection in a third. Reconstructing a single event means assembling it by hand across three interfaces, and the connection, whether the door opening and the movement belong to the same person, never comes together on its own.
An incident process nobody has tested. There is a camera system, there is access control, there are alarms, but nobody has walked through what happens in a live situation: who gets notified, who reviews the footage, who produces the export, and within what deadline. The first real incident is not the best time to find that out.
Planning a Server Room or Critical Infrastructure Project?
Briefly describe your needs, and one of our engineering colleagues will call you back soon.
or email us directly: info@digitechold.com
Environments we support
Enterprise data centers
Layered access control and video surveillance from the site boundary to the rack cabinet.
Colocation data centers
Tenant separation and rack-level access logging that stands up to a customer's audit.
Server rooms and edge sites
Unattended sites with remotely monitored video surveillance and alarm receiving.
Manufacturing and industrial IT environments
Industrial camera systems, license plate recognition and barrier-controlled access across the plant.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions about data center physical security
A data center needs an access control system that handles permissions by zone and ties every event to a unique identifier. The minimum is a centrally managed card system with different permissions per zone; technical spaces and the white space typically add two-factor entry. The system is good when revoking a permission is a single step, the log can be queried and exported afterwards, and entries can be matched to the camera system's recordings. An office-grade, single-zone solution is not enough in a data center.
RFID card access identifies what the person is carrying; biometrics identifies who is entering. A card is cheaper, quick to issue and can be given to visitors, but it can also be lent and lost. Biometrics, whether fingerprint, palm vein or facial recognition, removes that risk, at the cost of being more expensive, slower to pass through, and raising separate data-processing questions.
In practice a combination is typical: cards for the outer zones, card plus biometrics or a PIN for the white space and the technical spaces. Everyday traffic stays fast, while a borrowed card is not enough in the critical zones.
In a data center we expect a camera system to provide evidence after the fact rather than deterrence. That shows up in resolution, camera angle and lighting: entry points and corridor ends need an image where the face and the activity are identifiable, not just the fact that something moved. We use IP camera systems, because resolution, network integration and video analytics are all available on that platform.
The typical layout: perimeter and entrance cameras, corridor cameras between the rack rows, and dedicated cameras on the delivery and contractor entry points. Low, even lighting in the data hall is a design consideration in its own right, since most unusable footage comes down to the light rather than the camera.
Storage demand is the product of four factors: the number of cameras, the resolution and frame rate, the efficiency of the compression, and the retention time. As an order of magnitude, a 4 MP camera compressed with H.265 produces a few gigabytes a day on continuous recording; motion-triggered recording produces a fraction of that, but less predictably.
Retention time is set by business and contractual expectations, and we treat it as a design input. It is worth clarifying the data protection aspects with your data protection adviser before we size the system. We always design storage for the target retention time, with redundancy and headroom, because overwritten footage is missing exactly when it is needed.
The level of integration decides whether an event can be reconstructed in minutes or hours. The simplest level is correlation by time: the access log and the recordings can be searched on a shared timestamp. Substantially better is VMS-based integration, where an entry event brings up the matching footage in one click.
In larger, multi-site environments a PSIM layer ties together access control, the camera system, intrusion detection and often fire detection too, with predefined event-handling scenarios. It is worth deciding on integration at design stage: connecting three independently chosen systems afterwards is considerably more expensive.
With an electronic cabinet lock that runs as part of the access control system: the tenant's staff open the cabinet with their own credential, opening and closing are logged with a timestamp, and permissions can be granted and revoked per cabinet. This can be complemented with a camera aimed at the row end or the cabinet, so the log entry has footage attached to it.
This capability typically comes up for business rather than technical reasons: the tenant has to prove to their own customer who had access to their equipment. An existing cabinet estate can be retrofitted with these locks, scheduled row by row, without downtime.
Regular maintenance covers four things. Physical condition: cleaning camera optics, checking mountings and camera angles, inspecting readers and lock mechanisms. Operation: checking recording and image quality camera by camera, the state of the recorder and the storage, and whether backups and overwriting work. Permissions: reviewing active cards and access rights, and revoking obsolete permissions. Finally, software and firmware updates, and testing alarm transmission and the remote monitoring connection.
Permission review is the one most places skip, and most real incidents trace back to it.
A firm price can be given after a survey, because a few well-defined factors drive the figure: the number of protected zones and access points, the number and type of cameras, the target retention time and the storage capacity that goes with it, how far rack-level locking extends, the level of integration (standalone systems, VMS or PSIM), the remote monitoring service, and whether this is a greenfield build or a modernization in a live environment.
There is an order-of-magnitude difference between a few-zone server room system and a multi-floor colocation data center installation, which is why we always ask for a site survey before quoting.
WHY US?
Why clients choose us
Vendor independence. We do not shape the concept around a single manufacturer's portfolio: we design and install both access control and camera systems, including Hikvision, Axis, Bosch, HID and Nedap equipment.
Data center experience, not general property protection. Rack-level locking, colocation tenant separation and camera coverage of the white space are a different job from securing an office building or a warehouse.
Installation in live, operating environments. In a data center, downtime is not an option. Where the service cannot stop, we plan phased installation, temporary coverage and night work.
Rack-level access logging. Electronic cabinet locks, individual identification and event logging: the level that colocation tenants' own customers ask about, and the one most systems cannot provide.
Defined SLA and a committed call-out time. In our maintenance contracts the response time and the call-out time are not a promise but a committed parameter.
The whole critical infrastructure in one pair of hands. Physical security, fire detection, power supply and cooling: the same engineering team sees how they affect one another. That is what a purely security contractor cannot offer.
Physical security, fire detection, power and cooling infrastructurefrom one team.
Selected references
Data center and critical infrastructure projects
Lenovo
Hungary
Citi
Hungary
Orlen
Hungary
Planning an access control or video surveillance project?
Tell us briefly what you need — design, installation, modernization or an audit — and one of our engineers will get back to you within one business day.
- 5-minute project scoping call
- Critical infrastructure expertise
- +36 30 83 52 442